YOU FILED A CRA. WHAT HAPPENS IN COURT NOW?

A Child Requiring Assistance (CRA) claim is a court case in which the Juvenile Court is asked to help parents and/or school officials with the supervision and/or management of a child who is at least 6 but not yet 18 years old. There are five types of CRA but below are the four most commonly filed:  

1.       Runaway: Child 6 to 18: A child between the ages of 6 and 18 who “repeatedly runs away from the home of a parent, legal guardian or custodian having custody of the child.”  

2.       Stubborn: Child 6 to 18: A child between the ages of 6 and 18 who “repeatedly refuses to obey the lawful and reasonable commands of said parent or guardian resulting in said parent’s or guardian’s inability to care for and protect said child…”

3.       Truant: Child 6 to 16: A child between the ages of 6 and 18 who “is not excused from attendance in accordance with the lawful and reasonable regulations of such child's school, has willfully failed to attend school for more than 8 school days in a quarter…” 

4.       School Offender: Child 6 to 16:  “A school district may initiate an application for assistance in said court stating that said child is not excused from attendance in accordance with the lawful and reasonable regulations of such child's school, has willfully failed to attend school for more than 8 school days in a quarter or repeatedly fails to obey the lawful and reasonable regulations of the child's school.”

If after a preliminary hearing the Court decides the child requires assistance, the case will be scheduled for future court hearings. Below is an overview of the most frequently used types of hearings in a CRA case:

What happens at a Fact-Finding Hearing?

At the Fact-Finding Hearing, each party has a right to be heard and has the right to have a trial in front of a different judge who conducted the preliminary hearing. [Although this requirement is stated in the statute, this does not always happen. You could have the same judge from the initial filing to the disposition.]  The applicant, whether it be a parent or a school official, who filed the application must present evidence that shows to the judge, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the child requires assistance. If the judge finds that the child requires assistance, the court will schedule a case conference and disposition hearing.

What happens at a case conference?

The case conference allows the parties and any third-party collaterals (i.e. probation officer, representative from child’s school, clinicians, Department of Children and Families (DCF) if involved with the family, etc.) to collaborate and agree on plan for the child. The parties should be cautioned to only agree to tasks that they will follow through with. If a party agrees to do a task at the case conference that they have no intention of following through with, when the court gets a report on the progress of the plan it will be reported as a failure.

What happens at disposition?

At disposition the judge will order the child: to remain at home (and may impose conditions for the child to stay at home); into the custody of a relative or other appropriate adult; or into the custody of DCF (and may also order that DCF place the child out of the home).

Once the court places the child in DCF custody, DCF decides where to place the child. The disposition is first reviewed by the court after 120 days. At that review (or between reviews), the case can be dismissed, the court can change the custody order or conditions, or the case can continue with the same orders in place. There are three more reviews that happen after the first every 90 days.

Have questions or concerns about your child? Contact us to discuss further:

E.M. Curran & Associates LLC

10 Tower Office Park
Suite 406
Woburn, MA 01801
Phone: 781-933-1542
Fax: 781-933-1549
ellen@emcurranlegal.com

IS YOUR CHILD HABITUALLY TRUANT DUE TO THEIR SPECIAL NEEDS?

If your child is habitually truant due to their special needs, you need to be aware of the February, 2018  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case "Millis Public Schools v. M.P. & others".

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts recently heard a case involving M.P., a 15-year old girl with multiple diagnoses including OCD, PTSD, anxiety disorder, autism and a severe bladder condition; who was referred to the juvenile court as a child requiring assistance (CRA) on the grounds that she was habitually truant by her school district, Millis Public Schools.

M.P. was offered several alternative educational learning opportunities. Some of these alternatives included attending an online high school, a therapeutic program – with a shortened day, private tutoring at home, private tutoring at the library, and finally a special education day school. M.P. failed to consistently attend any of these alternative educational settings. At all times relevant, M.P. expressed her desire to attend school and to do well in school. She often expressed disappointment when she was unable to attend. M.P. and her family fought the CRA referral on the grounds that she was unable to attend school not because of her willfulness but due to her medical issues.

Under the children requiring assistance (CRA) statute, a child “willfully fails to attend school” if the child’s repeated failure to attend school arises from reasons portending delinquent behavior. CRA petitions can be filed where a child who is of compulsory school attendance age is “habitually truant.” The statute allows the juvenile court to change a child’s custody by placing them in the home of relative or an out-of-home placement if the judge determines the child “willfully failed to attend school for more than eight school days in a quarter.” The purpose of the CRA statute is well meaning. It has been established by multiples studies, that children who are not in school are more likely to get caught up in behaviors that may lead to delinquency and ultimately involvement in the court system. Allowing school districts to identify students who are habitually absent, is meant to help these students get support and hopefully help them prevent making negative life choices. 

Unfortunately, the CRA statute is frequently used when students with disabilities cannot attend school due to their emotional, social, medical and/or academic conditions. These students are often referred to the juvenile court system instead of steps being taken to support them and their needs. Many of these students with special needs are removed from their homes as a result of the CRA referral, which further exacerbates their condition instead of helping to alleviate some of their issues.

The Supreme Judicial Court ruled that a juvenile court judge can only find that a child is truant if the child is absent from school “purposefully, such that his or her behavior arises from reasons portending delinquent behavior.” To put it another way, the Supreme Judicial Court found that a child’s absence must be more than “merely voluntary or intentional,” the juvenile court must look “into a student’s purpose in missing school.” The Court emphasized that “a finding of willfulness is a fact-based inquiry that will depend on the circumstances of each case … [E]ach child’s purpose or reasons for missing school should be examined individually in order to determine whether the absences are willful beyond a reasonable doubt.”

The Supreme Judicial Court’s decision in Millis Public Schools vs M.P. and others is important because it supports children who cannot attend school because they have a mental or medical illness and helps these children avoid the court system and allows them to focus on their well-being and health care needs.'

Have questions or concerns about your student? Contact us to discuss further:

E.M. Curran & Associates LLC

10 Tower Office Park
Suite 406
Woburn, MA 01801
Phone: 781-933-1542
Fax: 781-933-1549
ellen@emcurranlegal.com